A self-employed male from London was watchful to tick the appropriate boxes, read a PPI compensation guide and demonstrate due diligence in putting in his very best to make certain he met the standards for cover. When new work dried up for him he tried to make a claim, just to be informed he would have to declare himself bankrupt before he would meet the criteria.Mr S from Eastbourne as well as his better half had mortgage loan insurance on a £200,000 loan. Mr S lost his job but was incapable to qualify for Job seekers allowance because his assets were way too substantial. Having payed off £60 every month for security which didn’t materialise, Mr S said he felt swindled.A review by the Citizens Advice Bureaux (CAB), issued in September 2005 discovered that 85 per cent of those that had attempted to use their PPI plan had been unsuccessful and had his or her request turned down. Though possibly not common or representative of the wider picture the CAB results make salutary reading.PPI Claims, Genuine Cases And The Final Results Of PPI CompensationThose people looking to make PPI claims could discover the following examples practical in assistance with assessing the suitability of cover and the particular dangers of either deliberate or unintentional non-compliance with the small print!Mrs T from London stated that she was encouraged to take out insurance coverage when she took out a personal loan. When she hesitated over this the ‘helpful’ consultant indicated it might be a beneficial concept ‘just in case’. At this point she is expecting and unsurprisingly, is not really covered for maternity leave.Mrs V from Essex made her personal loan cover claim immediately after being made redundant from her well paid employment having made installments for three years. She duly signed on with the Job centre as a condition of her insurance plan although she thought it unrealistic that she would find a job as nicely paid as her previous job. This turned out to be the case and immediately after three months her Job centre advisor insisted she take a place as a Filing Clerk. Mrs V deemed this type of employment intolerable and unsurprisingly finished going to the job centre and was therefore unable to pursue her claim.Mr T took out a home loan in 1989 and his broker organized PPI with the lender for him as a self-employed partner in business. Mr T specifically asked if he would be covered as a self-employed particular person and was informed without a doubt. The business were unable, he tried to make a claim but was told the small print expressed it solely insured people who were declaring lack of employment benefit.